Home/Ninth Circuit/James Haynes Camarillo v. Daniel J. McCarthy Director

James Haynes Camarillo v. Daniel J. McCarthy Director

990 F.2d 1256, 1993 WL 98825
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in James Haynes Camarillo v. Daniel J. McCarthy Director. Read the opinion of the Court — 998 F.2d 638 →
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·Decided April 2, 1993·No. 92-15991·Unpublished

Opinion

990 F.2d 1256w

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel.
James Haynes CAMARILLO, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
Daniel J. MCCARTHY, Director, et al., Defendants-Appellants,

No. 92-15991.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted Feb. 3, 1993.
Decided April 2, 1993.

NOTE: THE COURT HAS WITHDRAWN THIS OPINION

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

James Haynes Camarillo v. Daniel J. McCarthy Director, 990 F.2d 1256, 1993 WL 98825 (9th Cir. 1993).

990 F.2d 1256 (James Haynes Camarillo v. Daniel J. McCarthy Director) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.