Jackson v. State

260 S.W.3d 371, 2008 Mo. App. LEXIS 125, 2008 WL 220181
Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided January 29, 2008·No. WD 67489·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

ORDER

Rosemary Jackson appeals the denial, after an evidentiary hearing, of her 29.15 motion for ineffective assistance of counsel. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. A written opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the applicable principles of law would have no prece-dential or jurisprudential value. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order. Judgment affirmed pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Jackson v. State, 260 S.W.3d 371, 2008 Mo. App. LEXIS 125, 2008 WL 220181 (Mo. Ct. App. 2008).

260 S.W.3d 371 (Jackson v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. Douglas
260 S.W.3d 371 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2008)