Jackson v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Jackson v. State

157 S.W.3d 327, 2005 Mo. App. LEXIS 287, 2005 WL 406058

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided February 22, 2005·No. ED 83878·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Movant, Elton Jackson, appeals from a judgment denying on the merits, after an evidentiary hearing, his Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief.

The findings and conclusions of the motion court are based on findings of fact that are not clearly erroneous. No error of law appears. An opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no precedential value. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order.

*328 We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Movant, Elton Jackson, appeals from a judgment denying on the merits, after an evidentiary hearing, his Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief.

The findings and conclusions of the motion court are based on findings of fact that are not clearly erroneous. No error of law appears. An opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no precedential value. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order.

*328 We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Jackson v. State, 157 S.W.3d 327, 2005 Mo. App. LEXIS 287, 2005 WL 406058 (Mo. Ct. App. 2005).

Pincite

157 S.W.3d 327 (Jackson v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.