Jackson v. State
216 S.W.3d 710, 2007 Mo. App. LEXIS 432, 2007 WL 738652
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Jackson v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 2006 Mo. App. LEXIS 1674 →
Opinion
ORDER
The movant, Maceo Jackson, appeals the motion court’s denial, without an evidentia-ry hearing, of his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief. We have reviewed the parties’ briefs and the record on appeal and find no clear error. Rule 29.15(k). An opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been provided with a memorandum, for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this decision.
The motion court’s denial of the mov-ant’s Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b)(2).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Jackson v. State, 216 S.W.3d 710, 2007 Mo. App. LEXIS 432, 2007 WL 738652 (Mo. Ct. App. 2007).
216 S.W.3d 710 (Jackson v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.