State v. Douglas

260 S.W.3d 371, 2008 Mo. App. LEXIS 130, 2008 WL 220355

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided January 29, 2008·No. WD 67238·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Mr. Kim Douglas appeals his convictions for sexual assault and deviate sexual assault.

For reasons stated in the memorandum provided to the parties, we affirm. Rule 30.25(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Douglas, 260 S.W.3d 371, 2008 Mo. App. LEXIS 130, 2008 WL 220355 (Mo. Ct. App. 2008).

Pincite

260 S.W.3d 371 (State v. Douglas) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.