State v. Douglas

260 S.W.3d 371, 2008 Mo. App. LEXIS 130, 2008 WL 220355
CourtMissouri Court of Appeals
DecidedJanuary 29, 2008
DocketWD 67238
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 260 S.W.3d 371 (State v. Douglas) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State v. Douglas, 260 S.W.3d 371, 2008 Mo. App. LEXIS 130, 2008 WL 220355 (Mo. Ct. App. 2008).

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Mr. Kim Douglas appeals his convictions for sexual assault and deviate sexual assault.

For reasons stated in the memorandum provided to the parties, we affirm. Rule 30.25(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Jackson v. State
260 S.W.3d 371 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2008)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
260 S.W.3d 371, 2008 Mo. App. LEXIS 130, 2008 WL 220355, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-douglas-moctapp-2008.