J. R. Construction Corp. v. Berkeley Apts., Inc.

259 A.D. 830, 19 N.Y.S.2d 500, 1940 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6884
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided April 8, 1940·Published·Cited by 6 cases

Opinion

In an action brought to recover moneys claimed to be due under certain building contracts, in which defendant set up a defense and' counterclaim of duress, judgment in so far as it dismisses the complaint and awards costs to defendant, reversed on the law and the facts and a new trial granted, with costs to abide the event. The evidence of duress was insufficient to warrant the submission of the issue to the jury, because of the absence of proof that defendant did not have an adequate legal remedy. (Doyle v. Rector, etc., Trinity Church, 133 N. Y. 372.) Even if there were such proof, the present record indicates that defendant ratified the disputed agreements. (Abelman v. Indelli & Conforti Co., 170 App. Div. 740.) Lazansky, P. J., Carswell, Johnston, Adel and Close, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

J. R. Construction Corp. v. Berkeley Apts., Inc., 259 A.D. 830, 19 N.Y.S.2d 500, 1940 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6884 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1940).

259 A.D. 830 (J. R. Construction Corp. v. Berkeley Apts., Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Austin Instrument, Inc. v. Loral Corp.
272 N.E.2d 533 (New York Court of Appeals, 1971)
Gallagher Switchboard Corp. v. Heckler Electric Co.
34 Misc. 2d 256 (New York Supreme Court, 1962)
Halperin v. Wolosoff
282 A.D. 876 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1953)
Vines v. General Outdoor Advertising Co.
171 F.2d 487 (Second Circuit, 1948)