Iowa-Wisconsin Bridge Co. v. United States

84 F. Supp. 852, 114 Ct. Cl. 464
CourtUnited States Court of Claims
DecidedJuly 11, 1949
Docket46079
StatusPublished
Cited by28 cases

This text of 84 F. Supp. 852 (Iowa-Wisconsin Bridge Co. v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Court of Claims primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Iowa-Wisconsin Bridge Co. v. United States, 84 F. Supp. 852, 114 Ct. Cl. 464 (cc 1949).

Opinions

HOWELL, Judge.

The plaintiff sues to recover just compensation for the alleged taking of its property by reason of the construction by the Government of Lock and Dam No. 9 in the Mississippi River 15.5 miles downstream from plaintiff’s property.

In 1928 Congress authorized1 the corporate predecessor of the plaintiff (sometimes hereinafter called the Bridge Com’pany) to construct, maintain and operate a bridge and approaches thereto across the Mississippi River at or near Lansing, Iowa, to a point opposite in the State of Wisconsin. In 1930 and 1931 the Bridge Company secured the necessary approval of the War Department of its plans and specifications for the steel bridge across the Mississippi River and for the construction of the approach on the Wisconsin side oí the river consisting of wooden pile bridges over Big, Indian, Stevens, Henderson and Winneshiek sloughs. The project was completed and opened to traffic in June 1931.

[855]*855At the site of the steel bridge, the Mississippi River is approximately 1,200 feet wide from bank to bank, and the bridge is approximately 1,600 feet long. Between the east bank of the Mississippi River and a point opposite near DeSoto, Wisconsin, there is an expanse of valley or bottom land cut by various sloughs, including the ones mentioned above.

The Bridge Company’s project consists -of an approach leading eastward from the town of Lansing, Towa, to the Mississippi River, a high steel fixed span across the Mississippi River, and a roadway or dike leading eastward from the east end of the steel bridge on the Wisconsin side. The roadway and approach on the Wisconsin side extends easterly for about 2% miles from the east bank of the Mississippi River to a point near DeSoto, Wisconsin, and consists of a road on a raised earthen embankment or dike, with wooden bridges traversing the several sloughs. The sloughs as approached from the Mississippi River, and the lengths of the wooden bridges traversing the sloughs, are: Big Slough, 288-foot bridge; Indian Slough, 20-foot bridge; Stevens Slough, 15-foot bridge; Henderson Slough, 30-foot bridge; Winneshiek Slough, 432-foot bridge including its extension over the Burlington Railroad right-of-way. Winneshiek Slough itself was 250 feet wide and Big Slough 148 feet wide at the time the bridges were constructed. On October 3, 1942, the Secretary of War and the Chief of Engineers approved the Bridge Company’s plans for the replacement of the timber bridges .across Stevens and Indian sloughs with -solid fills and in 1944 Stevens Slough was filled in where it intersects the dike roadway.

Plaintiff’s right-of-way on the Wisconsin side of the Mississippi River is 200 feet wide except for approximately % mile at the eastern end where it is 30Q feet wide. Prior to the construction of the dike, the ■ elevation of the land within the right-of-way was approximately 620 feet above mean sea level. Ordinary high-water stage .at the site of the Bridge Company’s project was 616.5 feet and the height of the dike was approximately elevation 629 feet, leaving a vertical spread of 12% feet at times of ordinary high water. As built, the dike was approximately 80 feet wide at the base and about 30 feet wide at the top. In many places the shoulders have now broken back to 25 or 26 feet.

In constructing the dike, the Bridge Company first cleared the trees and vegetation from all -but the extreme fringes of the right-of-way. Working from the center of the right-of-way, earth was scooped up from each side to build the embankment, leaving borrow pits on each side for the entire length of the roadway. The pits were from 4 to 6 feet deep but were not of uniform width. Along about 60 percent of the length of the dike’ the borrow pits extended to the boundary of the right-of-way on each side of the dike. Along the remainder of the dike, berms of natural ground were left between the outside of the borrow pits and the boundary of the right-of-way, such berms varying in width from 15 to 25 feet. A berm of natural ground 4 to 5 feet wide was also left between the toe of the dike and the borrow pits. As the roadway or embankment approached the several sloughs, no earth was scooped up from the natural ground along the side of the dike for a distance of from 10 to 30 feet from the bank of each slough. Such natural ground barriers were substantially larger on each side of the dike adjacent to the west bank of Winneshiek Slough. On each side of the embankment, narrow pieces of ground were left undisturbed in the borrow pits at intervals for the purpose of obstructing the longitudinal flow of water in the borrow pits. Two small embankments for driveways leading to small farms near Winneshiek Slough served a similar purpose. The dike was surfaced with bluff-run material and used as a road.

When the dike was built, ordinary low-water stage at the site of the project was 611.91. The bottom of the borrow pits along both sides of the dike ranged in elevation from 614 to 616 feet so that little or no water stood in the pits except at times when the water approached ordinary high of 616.5 and in times of flood.

Lock and Dam No. 9 is one of a series of navigation dams constructed in the Mississippi River in order to create a nine-[856]*856foot channel between the mouth of the Illinois and the Twin City Dam, as provided by .the Act of July 3, 1930, c. 847, 46 Stat. 918, 927, ■ It is located 15.5 miles downstream from the bridge property and consists of a lock and concrete dam with 13 gates in the Mississippi River and an earthen section 9,300 feet long extending from the west end of the dam to the west side of the valley. In closed position the maximum and crest elevation of the gates is 620 feet above sea level. The gates of the dam were lowered for the first time for the purpose of maintaining full pool on April 11, 1938, and full pool level was reached April 18, 1938. The dam is operated to maintain project pool elevation of 620 feet at Lansing, 15 miles north of the dam although when the dam is in operation the pool at Lansing often exceeds 620 feet from a few inches to as much as a foot. When the flow of the river is sufficient to maintain pool level of 620 at Lansing without the help of the dam, the gates are lifted clear of the water. The pool of, the dam extends back about 30 miles to Lock and Dam No. 8 at Genoa, Wisconsin. The Bridge Company’s property is located in the vicinity of Lansing, about midway in the pool of Dam No. 9.

In February, 1944, plaintiff filed its first petition in this case alleging that a servitude had been placed upon its dike and bridges for which it was entitled to just compensation. The project had been and was then being operated as a toll bridge by the Bridge Company or its receivers. On March 18, 1945, large volumes of ice came down Big and. Winneshiek Sloughs which jammed and piled up against the trestles and bents of the wooden pile bridges and forced out several spans from each bridge which have not been replaced. Following the destruction of parts of the bridges, plaintiff amended its petition to include this circumstance.

Claims Relating to the Dike

The land in plaintiff’s right-of-way on which the dike was constructed was ^ast ground lying generally from two to five feet aboye ordinary high water mark of 616.5, averaging approximately 620 for the entire length. The bottoms of the borrow pits on either side of the dike were scooped out to elevation 616 in some instances and to 614 in others.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Palm Beach Isles Associates v. United States
58 Fed. Cl. 657 (Federal Claims, 2003)
Marathon Oil Co. v. United States
17 Cl. Ct. 116 (Court of Claims, 1989)
Goodman v. City of Crystal River
669 F. Supp. 394 (M.D. Florida, 1987)
Passaro v. United States
4 Cl. Ct. 395 (Court of Claims, 1984)
Paragon Energy Corp. v. United States
645 F.2d 966 (Court of Claims, 1981)
United States v. 101.88 Acres of Land
616 F.2d 762 (Fifth Circuit, 1980)
Zunamon
221 Ct. Cl. 835 (Court of Claims, 1979)
Pauley Petroleum Inc. v. United States
591 F.2d 1308 (Court of Claims, 1979)
United States v. 1,138.15 Acres of Land
441 F. Supp. 432 (W.D. Oklahoma, 1977)
Coast Indian Community v. United States
550 F.2d 639 (Court of Claims, 1977)
Runser v. City of Waterville
355 A.2d 747 (Supreme Judicial Court of Maine, 1976)
Goose Creek Hunting Club, Inc. v. United States
518 F.2d 579 (Court of Claims, 1975)
United States v. AMERICAN CYANAMID COMPANY
354 F. Supp. 1202 (S.D. New York, 1973)
Allen Gun Club v. United States
180 Ct. Cl. 423 (Court of Claims, 1967)
Bianco v. United States
171 Ct. Cl. 719 (Court of Claims, 1965)
Jones & Sears, Inc. v. United States
158 Ct. Cl. 162 (Court of Claims, 1962)
Tuder v. Material Service Corp.
177 F. Supp. 71 (N.D. Illinois, 1959)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
84 F. Supp. 852, 114 Ct. Cl. 464, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/iowa-wisconsin-bridge-co-v-united-states-cc-1949.