International Technology Corp. v. Winter

523 F.3d 1341, 2008 WL 1757679
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit·Decided July 7, 2008·No. 2007-1276·Published·Cited by 7 cases

Opinion

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

July 7, 2008

ERRATA

Appeal No. 2007-1276

INTERNATIONAL TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION v. Donald C. Winter, SECRETARY OF THE NAVY

Decided: April 18, 2008 Precedential Opinion

On Page 15, lines 17-19, delete the sentence “Two samples reported in Table A-8 of the Feasibility Study were designated as ‘CL,’ i.e., they were composed of a majority of clay.” In place of the deleted text, substitute the following:

The same was true of samples described as “CH.” See Exhibit 155, at 3. Some samples described in Tables A-3 and A-4 of the Feasibility Study were designated “CH.”

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

International Technology Corp. v. Winter, 523 F.3d 1341, 2008 WL 1757679 (Fed. Cir. 2008).

523 F.3d 1341 (International Technology Corp. v. Winter) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Hahnenkamm, LLC v. United States
104 F.4th 1333 (Federal Circuit, 2024)
Tetra Tech Facilities Construction, LLC
Armed Services Board of Contract Appeals, 2016
Optimum Services, Inc.
Armed Services Board of Contract Appeals, 2015
PBS&J Constructors, Inc.
Armed Services Board of Contract Appeals, 2014
CCI, Inc.
Armed Services Board of Contract Appeals, 2014
Delhur Industries, Inc. v. United States
95 Fed. Cl. 446 (Federal Claims, 2010)