Ingram v. State

591 So. 2d 683, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 360, 1992 WL 7205

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Ingram v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 6305 →

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided January 22, 1992·No. No. 91-3029·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 9.315, we affirm. See Bateman v. State, 566 So.2d 358 (Fla. 4th DCA 1990).

GLICKSTEIN, C.J.; and WARNER and FARMER, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Ingram v. State, 591 So. 2d 683, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 360, 1992 WL 7205 (Fla. Ct. App. 1992).

Pincite

591 So. 2d 683 (Ingram v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

566 So. 2d 358 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1990)