Ingram v. State
599 So. 2d 785, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 7281, 1992 WL 138783
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided June 24, 1992·No. No. 91-0948·Published·Cited by 2 cases
Opinion
We find no error as to appellant’s point I and we affirm appellant’s sentence. As to appellant’s point II, we do not consider his constitutional attack on Chapter 89-280, Laws of Florida, because appellant would have been found to be an habitual felony offender under the pre-amended statute as well. Wright v. State, 579 So.2d 418 (Fla. 4th DCA 1991).
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Ingram v. State, 599 So. 2d 785, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 7281, 1992 WL 138783 (Fla. Ct. App. 1992).
599 So. 2d 785 (Ingram v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Luchak v. State
606 So. 2d 494 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1992)
Harris v. State
608 So. 2d 847 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1992)