Ingram v. State

591 So. 2d 683, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 360, 1992 WL 7205
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedJanuary 22, 1992
DocketNo. 91-3029
StatusPublished

This text of 591 So. 2d 683 (Ingram v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Ingram v. State, 591 So. 2d 683, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 360, 1992 WL 7205 (Fla. Ct. App. 1992).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 9.315, we affirm. See Bateman v. State, 566 So.2d 358 (Fla. 4th DCA 1990).

GLICKSTEIN, C.J.; and WARNER and FARMER, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Bateman v. State
566 So. 2d 358 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1990)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
591 So. 2d 683, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 360, 1992 WL 7205, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ingram-v-state-fladistctapp-1992.