Ingram v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Ingram v. State

540 So. 2d 936, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 856, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 1858, 1989 WL 32663

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedApril 6, 1989

DocketNo. 88-2079

StatusPublished

This text of 540 So. 2d 936 (Ingram v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Ingram v. State, 540 So. 2d 936, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 856, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 1858, 1989 WL 32663 (Fla. Ct. App. 1989).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The trial court erred in denying the motion to suppress evidence seized in an illegal search. See Ybarra v. Illinois, 444 U.S. 85, 100 S.Ct. 338, 62 L.Ed.2d 238 (1979), reh. den., 444 U.S. 1049, 100 S.Ct. 741, 62 L.Ed.2d 737 (1980); Julian v. State, 528 So.2d 427 (Fla. 2d DCA 1988); Robinson v. State, 527 So.2d 944 (Fla. 3d DCA 1988); Redfin v. State, 453 So.2d 425 (Fla. 5th DCA 1984). The conviction is REVERSED.

SHIVERS, ZEHMER, and BARFIELD, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The trial court erred in denying the motion to suppress evidence seized in an illegal search. See Ybarra v. Illinois, 444 U.S. 85, 100 S.Ct. 338, 62 L.Ed.2d 238 (1979), reh. den., 444 U.S. 1049, 100 S.Ct. 741, 62 L.Ed.2d 737 (1980); Julian v. State, 528 So.2d 427 (Fla. 2d DCA 1988); Robinson v. State, 527 So.2d 944 (Fla. 3d DCA 1988); Redfin v. State, 453 So.2d 425 (Fla. 5th DCA 1984). The conviction is REVERSED.

SHIVERS, ZEHMER, and BARFIELD, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

540 So. 2d 936, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 856, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 1858, 1989 WL 32663, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ingram-v-state-fladistctapp-1989.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack