Ingram v. State
540 So. 2d 936, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 856, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 1858, 1989 WL 32663
Opinion
The trial court erred in denying the motion to suppress evidence seized in an illegal search. See Ybarra v. Illinois, 444 U.S. 85, 100 S.Ct. 338, 62 L.Ed.2d 238 (1979), reh. den., 444 U.S. 1049, 100 S.Ct. 741, 62 L.Ed.2d 737 (1980); Julian v. State, 528 So.2d 427 (Fla. 2d DCA 1988); Robinson v. State, 527 So.2d 944 (Fla. 3d DCA 1988); Redfin v. State, 453 So.2d 425 (Fla. 5th DCA 1984). The conviction is REVERSED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Ingram v. State, 540 So. 2d 936, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 856, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 1858, 1989 WL 32663 (Fla. Ct. App. 1989).
540 So. 2d 936 (Ingram v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Ybarra v. Illinois
444 U.S. 85 (Supreme Court, 1980)
Redfin v. State
453 So. 2d 425 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1984)
Julian v. State
528 So. 2d 427 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1988)
Robinson v. State
527 So. 2d 944 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1988)