Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Ingram v. State

Ingram v. State

609 So. 2d 166, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 12433, 1992 WL 362177
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Ingram v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 6305 →
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided December 9, 1992·No. No. 92-03249·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Ingram appeals the dismissal of his post-conviction relief motion. We affirm. The trial court properly dismissed Ingram’s motion because it did not comply with Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.987. We also find that the claims Ingram raises to support his motion are without merit.

Affirmed.

SCHOONOVER, A.C.J., and HALL and THREADGILL, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Ingram v. State, 609 So. 2d 166, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 12433, 1992 WL 362177 (Fla. Ct. App. 1992).

609 So. 2d 166 (Ingram v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.