In the Matter of Anthony Eugene Cheatham
This text of 304 Ga. 645 (In the Matter of Anthony Eugene Cheatham) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
304 Ga. 645 FINAL COPY
S19Y0155. IN THE MATTER OF ANTHONY EUGENE CHEATHAM.
PER CURIAM.
This disciplinary matter1 is before the Court on the report and
recommendation of special master Trishanda Treadwell recommending that
Anthony Eugene Cheatham (State Bar No. 122215) be disbarred for his
misconduct in relation to a real estate closing in which he converted the sales
proceeds to his own use. Cheatham is currently suspended until further order
of this Court because of his failure to respond to a Notice of Investigation
unrelated to the allegations set forth in the formal complaint before the Court
here. See S18Y1382 (June 18, 2018).
The State Bar brought its formal complaint in April 2018. Cheatham, who
was admitted to the Bar in 1991, was personally served with the formal
1 On January 12, 2018, this Court entered an order amending Part IV of the Rules and Regulations for the Organization and Government of the State Bar of Georgia (“Bar Rules”), including Bar Rule 4-102 (d), which contains the Georgia Rules of Professional Conduct. The order provided that, with two exceptions not applicable here, “these amendments shall be effective as of July 1, 2018 and shall apply to disciplinary proceedings commenced on or after that date.” The order further specified that “the former rules shall continue to apply to disciplinary proceedings commenced before July 1, 2018.” complaint on May 2, 2018, but he failed to file an answer and was found in
default by the special master. See Bar Rule 4-212 (a). The facts, as established
by Cheatham’s default and as found by the special master, are that in May 2017
Cheatham agreed to close a real estate transaction. However, at the time that he
agreed to represent the purchasers in this real estate transaction, Cheatham had
already been administratively suspended from the practice of law on May 5,
2017 for failure to complete CLE requirements, and that suspension was to
extend through August 4, 2017. While Cheatham was suspended from the
practice of law, he received into his IOLTA account a wire transfer of $140,600
from the purchasers to fund the purchase; he had also received a $1,000 check
as earnest money. He converted the funds to his own use and commingled the
funds with his personal funds. He closed the sale on July 13, 2017, but did not
have sufficient funds to promptly disburse the proceeds of the sale to the seller.
Instead he made incremental payments and misled both the seller and purchasers
about the reasons therefor. He issued one check for $56,880 on July 25, 2017,
but stopped payment on the check the next day because he knew there were
insufficient funds in his IOLTA account. Additionally, Cheatham failed to
timely prepare and record the warranty deed for the real estate deal; failed to
2 communicate with the seller and purchasers regarding the deed; failed to
account for the proceeds of the sale when asked to do so; and abandoned the
completion of the sale to the detriment of the seller and purchasers.
In light of this conduct, the special master correctly determined that
Cheatham violated Rules 1.3, 1.4, 1.15 (I) (a) and (c), 1.15 (II) (a) and (b), 5.5
(a), and 8.4 (a) (4) of the Georgia Rules of Professional Conduct found in Bar
Rule 4-102 (d). The maximum sanction for a violation of Rule 1.4 is a public
reprimand, and the maximum sanction for a violation of the remaining rules is
disbarment. The special master, after considering the ABA Standards for
Imposing Lawyer Sanctions, see In the Matter of Morse, 266 Ga. 652, 653 (470
SE2d 232) (1996), found that the following factors in aggravation applied:
dishonest or selfish motive, bad faith obstruction of the disciplinary proceeding
by intentionally failing to comply with the disciplinary rules, vulnerability of the
victim, and substantial experience in the practice of law. See ABA Standard
9.22. The special master also concluded that disbarment was consistent with
prior cases disbarring lawyers who abandoned clients, stole money, acted
dishonestly, and defaulted in the disciplinary process. See In the Matter of
Snipes, 303 Ga. 800 (815 SE2d 54) (2018) (disbarment ordered for attorney
who settled case without client’s knowledge and converted funds to personal
3 use); In the Matter of Mathis, 297 Ga. 867 (778 SE2d 793) (2015) (disbarment
ordered for attorney who misappropriated client funds that had been wired to
attorney in advance of a real estate closing); In the Matter of Myers, 297 Ga.
783 (778 SE2d 223) (2015) (disbarment ordered for attorney who abandoned
two clients, charged unreasonable fees, refused to refund unearned fees, and
failed to respond to disciplinary authorities); In the Matter of Gist, 297 Ga. 142
(772 SE2d 705) (2015) (disbarment ordered for attorney who, as trustee for a
client’s trust, failed to provide an accounting when requested by co-trustee and
wrote checks from a non-IOLTA account and who, as a financial services
professional, misappropriated millions of dollars invested by more than 30
clients); and In the Matter of Jones, 296 Ga. 151 (765 SE2d 360) (2014)
(disbarment ordered for attorney who absconded with client funds and failed to
respond to disciplinary authorities). See also ABA Standards 4.11 (a), 4.41 (b),
4.61, and 7.1. In addition, this Court notes that Cheatham committed these
violations while under suspension from the practice of law.
Having considered the record, we agree that disbarment is the appropriate
sanction in this matter. Accordingly, it is hereby ordered that the name of
Anthony Eugene Cheatham be removed from the rolls of persons authorized to
4 practice law in the State of Georgia. Cheatham is reminded of his duties
pursuant to former Bar Rule 4-219 (c).
Disbarred. All the Justices concur.
5 Decided October 22, 2018.
Disbarment.
Paula J. Frederick, General Counsel State Bar, Jenny K. Mittelman,
Assistant General Counsel State Bar, for State Bar of Georgia.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
304 Ga. 645, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-the-matter-of-anthony-eugene-cheatham-ga-2018.