In re Mathis

778 S.E.2d 793, 297 Ga. 867, 2015 Ga. LEXIS 749
CourtSupreme Court of Georgia
DecidedOctober 19, 2015
DocketS15Y1627, S15Y1628
StatusPublished
Cited by4 cases

This text of 778 S.E.2d 793 (In re Mathis) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In re Mathis, 778 S.E.2d 793, 297 Ga. 867, 2015 Ga. LEXIS 749 (Ga. 2015).

Opinion

Per curiam.

These disciplinary matters are before the Court on the State Bar’s issuance of two Notices of Discipline for the disbarment of Respondent Douglas J. Mathis (State Bar No. 477039) based on his violations of Rules 1.3,1.4,1.15 (I), 1.15 (II) (a) and (b), 8.4 (a) (4), and 9.3 of the Georgia Rules of Professional Conduct. See Bar Rule 4-102 (d). [868]*868The maximum sanction for a violation of Rules 1.3, 1.15 (I), 1.15 (II) (a) and (b), and 8.4 (a) (4) is disbarment; the maximum sanction for a violation of Rules 1.4 and 9.3 is a public reprimand. Because Mathis’s official address provided to the State Bar is a post office box, he was served by publication pursuant to Rule 4-203.1 (b) (3) (ii) on July 29, 2015, and August 5, 2015. Mathis failed to respond to the Notices of Investigation and failed to file Notices of Rejection. Accordingly, Mathis is in default, has no right to an evidentiary hearing, and is subject to such discipline and further proceedings as may be determined by this Court. See Bar Rule 4-208.1.

In Case No. S15Y1627, a client retained Mathis to conduct a real estate closing and wired him approximately $135,000 in advance of the closing. Mathis received the funds in his fiduciary capacity. He conducted the closing and issued a settlement statement to the parties, but the seller subsequently notified the client that it had not received any funds from the sale or a copy of the warranty deed. Upon attempting to contact Mathis, the client determined that he had disappeared and that his law office was abandoned. Mathis converted the client’s funds to his own use.

In Case No. S15Y1628, Mathis drafted estate planning documents for a couple and kept their original wills. Mathis was appointed the successor trustee of the husband’s irrevocable trust and held the funds in trust in a fiduciary capacity. When the husband died in June 2014, the wife attempted to obtain the husband’s original will from Mathis, but he did not return her calls. She determined that Mathis had disappeared and had abandoned his law office. Anew trustee was appointed, who determined that Mathis had converted funds from the trust to his own use.

This Court appointed receivers to take possession of Mathis’s files in September 2014 and entered an interim suspension against him in April 2015. In aggravation of discipline in both matters, the State Bar noted Mathis’s selfish and dishonest motive and a pattern of client neglect and dishonesty due to the multiple cases.

Based on our review of the record, we agree with the State Bar that disbarment is the appropriate sanction in these matters, particularly as it appears that Mathis acted willfully and dishonestly in converting his clients’ funds. Indeed, this appears to be a case for criminal prosecution. Accordingly, the name of Douglas J. Mathis is hereby removed from the rolls of persons entitled to practice law in the State of Georgia. He is reminded of his duties under Bar Rule 4-219 (c).

Disbarred.

All the Justices concur. [869]*869Decided October 19, 2015. Paula J. Frederick, General Counsel State Bar, Jenny K. Mittelman, Assistant General Counsel State Bar, for State Bar of Georgia.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

In the Matter of Bryan Matthew Pritchett
Supreme Court of Georgia, 2026
In the Matter of James W. Davis, III
901 S.E.2d 567 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 2024)
In the Matter of Glen Roy Fagan
876 S.E.2d 242 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 2022)
In the Matter of Anthony Eugene Cheatham
304 Ga. 645 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 2018)
In re Cheatham
820 S.E.2d 668 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 2018)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
778 S.E.2d 793, 297 Ga. 867, 2015 Ga. LEXIS 749, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-mathis-ga-2015.