In the Interest of B. R. F.

Court of Appeals of Georgia

In the Interest of B. R. F.

791 S.E.2d 859, 338 Ga. App. 762

Court of Appeals of Georgia·Decided October 3, 2016·No. A14A1536·Published·Cited by 27 cases

Opinion

PHIPPS, Presiding Judge.

On January 14, 2013, the juvenile court terminated a mother’s parental rights to her minor child, B. R. F. Over nine months later, on September 16, 2013, the mother filed an application for out-of-time discretionary review. We granted the application and affirmed the termination order. The Supreme Court granted certiorari and vacated our judgment, determining that we lacked jurisdiction to consider the application.

“A discretionary application seeking appellate review of an order terminating parental rights must be filed with the clerk of the appellate court within 30 days of entry of the termination order.”¹ The filing deadline is jurisdictional, and this court is unable to accept an untimely application.² While this court is authorized to grant an extension of time for the filing of an application for discretionary appeal, requests for extensions must be filed “on or before the due date of the discretionary application.”³ Otherwise, we lack the authority to grant the request.⁴

Because the mother’s application for discretionary review was untimely, we lack jurisdiction to consider it, and this appeal is hereby dismissed. The mother is advised, however, that “an indigent parent [may be] entitled to file an out-of-time application for discretionary review to remedy ineffective assistance of counsel if that parent was entitled to appointment of counsel as a matter of due process”⁵ pursuant to Lassiter v. Dept. of Social Svcs.6 To pursue such relief, the mother must first direct her request to the juvenile court, which is tasked with initially determining the mother’s rights.⁷ Similarly, any [763]*763argument based on statutory ineffective assistance of counsel must first be addressed to the juvenile court.⁸

Decided October 3, 2016. McMillan & Rawlings, Thomas C. Rawlings, for appellant. Samuel S. Olens, Attorney General, Shalen S. Nelson, Penny L. Hannah, Senior Assistant Attorneys General, Tammy M. Griner, Mark J. Cicero, Assistant Attorneys General, for appellee. Jane G. Okrasinski, Vicky O. Kimbrell, LisaJ. Krisher, Phyllis J. Holmen, amici curiae.

If the juvenile court grants a request to file an out-of-time application for discretionary review, the mother will have 30 days from the entry of that order to file an application in this court.⁹ If the juvenile court denies the request, the mother will have 30 days to file a notice of appeal from that decision.¹⁰

Appeal dismissed.

Andrews, P. J., Barnes, P. J., Ellington, P J., and McFadden, Ray, and McMillian, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PHIPPS, Presiding Judge.

On January 14, 2013, the juvenile court terminated a mother’s parental rights to her minor child, B. R. F. Over nine months later, on September 16, 2013, the mother filed an application for out-of-time discretionary review. We granted the application and affirmed the termination order. The Supreme Court granted certiorari and vacated our judgment, determining that we lacked jurisdiction to consider the application.

“A discretionary application seeking appellate review of an order terminating parental rights must be filed with the clerk of the appellate court within 30 days of entry of the termination order.”¹ The filing deadline is jurisdictional, and this court is unable to accept an untimely application.² While this court is authorized to grant an extension of time for the filing of an application for discretionary appeal, requests for extensions must be filed “on or before the due date of the discretionary application.”³ Otherwise, we lack the authority to grant the request.⁴

Because the mother’s application for discretionary review was untimely, we lack jurisdiction to consider it, and this appeal is hereby dismissed. The mother is advised, however, that “an indigent parent [may be] entitled to file an out-of-time application for discretionary review to remedy ineffective assistance of counsel if that parent was entitled to appointment of counsel as a matter of due process”⁵ pursuant to Lassiter v. Dept. of Social Svcs.6 To pursue such relief, the mother must first direct her request to the juvenile court, which is tasked with initially determining the mother’s rights.⁷ Similarly, any [763]*763argument based on statutory ineffective assistance of counsel must first be addressed to the juvenile court.⁸

Decided October 3, 2016. McMillan & Rawlings, Thomas C. Rawlings, for appellant. Samuel S. Olens, Attorney General, Shalen S. Nelson, Penny L. Hannah, Senior Assistant Attorneys General, Tammy M. Griner, Mark J. Cicero, Assistant Attorneys General, for appellee. Jane G. Okrasinski, Vicky O. Kimbrell, LisaJ. Krisher, Phyllis J. Holmen, amici curiae.

If the juvenile court grants a request to file an out-of-time application for discretionary review, the mother will have 30 days from the entry of that order to file an application in this court.⁹ If the juvenile court denies the request, the mother will have 30 days to file a notice of appeal from that decision.¹⁰

Appeal dismissed.

Andrews, P. J., Barnes, P. J., Ellington, P J., and McFadden, Ray, and McMillian, JJ., concur.

In the Interest of B. R. F., 791 S.E.2d 859, 338 Ga. App. 762 (Ga. Ct. App. 2016).

Pincite

791 S.E.2d 859 (In the Interest of B. R. F.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related