Charles Griffin, Jr. v. State

CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedMay 12, 2021
DocketA21D0299
StatusPublished

This text of Charles Griffin, Jr. v. State (Charles Griffin, Jr. v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Charles Griffin, Jr. v. State, (Ga. Ct. App. 2021).

Opinion

Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA,____________________ May 04, 2021

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order:

A21D0299. CHARLES GRIFFIN, JR. v. THE STATE.

On October 5, 2020, the trial court issued orders denying three motions filed by Charles Griffin, Jr.: a “pro se extraordinary motion for new trial,” a “pro se motion for clerk of court case file, court records & transcripts,” and a “pro se motion for ‘cause’ hearing (nunc pro tunc) orders of production and appearance.” On March 11, 2021, Griffin filed this application for discretionary review.1 We lack jurisdiction because the application is untimely. To be timely, an application must be filed within 30 days of entry of the order or judgment to be appealed. See OCGA § 5-6-35 (d). As Griffin filed this application 157 days after entry of the orders at issue, the application is untimely and subject to dismissal. See Crosson v. Conway, 291 Ga. 220, 220 (1) (728 SE2d 617) (2012); see also Boyle v. State, 190 Ga. App. 734, 734 (380 SE2d 57) (1989) (“The requirements of OCGA § 5-6-35 are jurisdictional and this [C]ourt cannot accept an appeal not made in compliance therewith.”). In his application, Griffin seeks permission to file an out-of-time application. However, he is not entitled to such relief because he filed his application well beyond the application due date. See In the Interest of B. R. F., 338 Ga. App. 762, 762 (791 SE2d 859) (2016) (“While this [C]ourt is authorized to grant an extension of time for the filing of an application for discretionary appeal, requests for extensions must be filed on or before the due date of the discretionary application. Otherwise, we lack the authority to grant the request.”) (citation and punctuation omitted); Court of Appeals

1 Griffin filed his application in the Supreme Court, which transferred it here. Rule 31 (i) (“No extensions of time will be granted to file a discretionary application unless a motion for extension of time is filed on or before the application due date.”). Accordingly, this application is hereby DISMISSED.

Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia Clerk’s Office, Atlanta,____________________ 05/04/2021 I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia. Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Boyle v. State of Georgia
380 S.E.2d 57 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1989)
Crosson v. Conway
728 S.E.2d 617 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 2012)
In the Interest of B. R. F.
791 S.E.2d 859 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 2016)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Charles Griffin, Jr. v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/charles-griffin-jr-v-state-gactapp-2021.