Cedric Williams v. Edna C. Harris

CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedApril 19, 2022
DocketA22D0313
StatusPublished

This text of Cedric Williams v. Edna C. Harris (Cedric Williams v. Edna C. Harris) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Cedric Williams v. Edna C. Harris, (Ga. Ct. App. 2022).

Opinion

Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA,____________________ April 19, 2022

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order:

A22D0313. CEDRIC WILLIAMS et al. v. EDNA C. HARRIS et al.

Cedric Williams and Kim Davis (“Applicants”) wish to appeal the trial court’s March 14, 2022 grant of Edna C. Harris’s “Complaint for Ejectment and Dispossession under OCGA § 44-7-50,” contending that the trial court erred by finding that they had breached the terms of their lease agreement with Harris. Applicants filed a motion for reconsideration, which the trial court denied on March 23, 2022. Thereafter, Applicants filed the current application for discretionary appeal on March 27, 2022. Generally, an application for discretionary appeal must be filed within 30 days of entry of the order sought to be appealed. OCGA § 5-6-35 (d). But the underlying subject matter of an appeal controls over the relief sought in determining the proper appellate procedure. Rebich v. Miles, 264 Ga. 467, 467-468 (448 SE2d 192) (1994). The underlying subject matter here is a dispossessory action. OCGA § 44-7-56 provides that “any” appeal from a dispossessory judgment must be filed within seven days of the date the judgment was entered. Ray M. Wright, Inc. v. Jones, 239 Ga. App. 521, 522 (521 SE2d 456) (1999); see also Radio Sandy Springs v. Allen Road Joint Venture, 311 Ga. App. 334 (715 SE2d 752) (2011). In addition, the denial of a motion for reconsideration is not subject to appeal, and the filing of such a motion does not extend the time for filing an appeal. See Luster v. Bank of America, N.A., 331 Ga. App. 510, 512 (769 SE2d 394) (2015). Because this application was filed thirteen days after the trial court’s order was entered, it is untimely. “The filing deadline is jurisdictional, and this [C]ourt is unable to accept an untimely application.” In the Interest of B. R. F., 338 Ga. App. 762, 762 (791 SE2d 859) (2016). Accordingly, this application for discretionary appeal is hereby DISMISSED.

Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia Clerk’s Office, Atlanta,____________________ 04/19/2022 I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia. Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Ray M. Wright, Inc. v. Jones
521 S.E.2d 456 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1999)
Rebich v. Miles
448 S.E.2d 192 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1994)
Radio Sandy Springs, Inc. v. Allen Road Joint Venture
715 S.E.2d 752 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 2011)
Luster v. Bank of America, N.A.
769 S.E.2d 394 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 2015)
In the Interest of B. R. F.
791 S.E.2d 859 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 2016)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Cedric Williams v. Edna C. Harris, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cedric-williams-v-edna-c-harris-gactapp-2022.