In Re Stevens

California Supreme Court

In Re Stevens

645 P.2d 99, 31 Cal. 3d 403, 183 Cal. Rptr. 48, 1982 Cal. LEXIS 181

CourtCalifornia Supreme Court

DecidedMay 20, 1982

DocketL.A. 31540

StatusPublished

Cited by20 cases

This text of 645 P.2d 99 (In Re Stevens) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering California Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In Re Stevens, 645 P.2d 99, 31 Cal. 3d 403, 183 Cal. Rptr. 48, 1982 Cal. LEXIS 181 (Cal. 1982).

Pincite

Opinions

Opinion

THE COURT.

The Commission on Judicial Performance, following a hearing before it and a review of a report of special masters, objections to that report, and related documents, found, inter alia: Judge Charles S. Stevens has served as judge of the Superior Court, County of Santa Barbara, since April 30, 1971. During his current term in office, and during the six years prior thereto, Judge Stevens repeatedly and persistently used racial and ethnic epithets, and made racially stereotypical remarks to counsel and court personnel. Most of these remarks occurred [404]*404during in chambers conferences rather than in open court. The commission further recited that, according to most witnesses, Judge Stevens has at all times performed his judicial duties fairly and equitably, and free from actual bias against any person regardless of race, ethnicity or sex, and that his remarks were both inappropriate and in poor taste.

The commission concluded that Judge Stevens’ conduct was “prejudicial to the administration of justice that brings the judicial office into disrepute” (Cal. Const., art. VI, § 18, subd. (c)), and recommended that he be censured.

Upon our review of the record we are satisfied that the foregoing conclusion of the commission is fully warranted and that the discipline recommended should be ádopted. Accordingly, and by this order, Judge Stevens is hereby publicly censured.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Opinion

THE COURT.

The Commission on Judicial Performance, following a hearing before it and a review of a report of special masters, objections to that report, and related documents, found, inter alia: Judge Charles S. Stevens has served as judge of the Superior Court, County of Santa Barbara, since April 30, 1971. During his current term in office, and during the six years prior thereto, Judge Stevens repeatedly and persistently used racial and ethnic epithets, and made racially stereotypical remarks to counsel and court personnel. Most of these remarks occurred [404]*404during in chambers conferences rather than in open court. The commission further recited that, according to most witnesses, Judge Stevens has at all times performed his judicial duties fairly and equitably, and free from actual bias against any person regardless of race, ethnicity or sex, and that his remarks were both inappropriate and in poor taste.

The commission concluded that Judge Stevens’ conduct was “prejudicial to the administration of justice that brings the judicial office into disrepute” (Cal. Const., art. VI, § 18, subd. (c)), and recommended that he be censured.

Upon our review of the record we are satisfied that the foregoing conclusion of the commission is fully warranted and that the discipline recommended should be ádopted. Accordingly, and by this order, Judge Stevens is hereby publicly censured.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

645 P.2d 99, 31 Cal. 3d 403, 183 Cal. Rptr. 48, 1982 Cal. LEXIS 181, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-stevens-cal-1982.

Opinions

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack