In re Joseph

880 A.2d 1213, 584 Pa. 82
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided July 15, 2005·No. No. 961 Disciplinary Docket No. 2·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 15th day of July, 2005, upon consideration of the Report and Recommendations of the Disciplinary Board [83] dated April 13, 2005, the Petition for Reinstatement is granted.

Pursuant to Rule 218(e), Pa.R.D.E., petitioner is directed to pay the expenses incurred by the Board in the investigation and processing of the Petition for Reinstatement.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re Joseph, 880 A.2d 1213, 584 Pa. 82 (Pa. 2005).

880 A.2d 1213 (In re Joseph) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.