In re Joseph

880 A.2d 1213
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided July 15, 2005·No. No. 961 Disciplinary Docket No. 2·Published

Opinion

ORDER

-PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 15th day of July, 2005, upon consideration of the Report and Rec[1214] ommendations of the Disciplinary Board dated April 18, 2005, the Petition for Reinstatement is granted.

Pursuant to Rule 218(e), Pa.R.D.E., petitioner is directed to pay the expenses incurred by the Board in the investigation and processing of the Petition for Reinstatement.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re Joseph, 880 A.2d 1213 (Pa. 2005).

880 A.2d 1213 (In re Joseph) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.