In re Joseph

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

In re Joseph

792 A.2d 1246, 568 Pa. 97, 2002 Pa. LEXIS 529

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided January 23, 2002·No. No. 131 DB 2001·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 23rd day of January, 2002, The Report and Recommendations of The Disciplinary Board of the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania dated December 14, 2001, are approved and IT IS ORDERED that ANDREW HART JOSEPH, who has been on inactive status, has never been suspended or disbarred, and has demonstrated that he has the moral qualifications, competency and learning in law required for admission to practice in the Commonwealth, shall be and is, hereby reinstated to active status as a member of the Bar of this Commonwealth. The expenses incurred by the Board in the investigation and processing of the Petition for Reinstatement shall be paid by the Petitioner.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 23rd day of January, 2002, The Report and Recommendations of The Disciplinary Board of the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania dated December 14, 2001, are approved and IT IS ORDERED that ANDREW HART JOSEPH, who has been on inactive status, has never been suspended or disbarred, and has demonstrated that he has the moral qualifications, competency and learning in law required for admission to practice in the Commonwealth, shall be and is, hereby reinstated to active status as a member of the Bar of this Commonwealth. The expenses incurred by the Board in the investigation and processing of the Petition for Reinstatement shall be paid by the Petitioner.

In re Joseph, 792 A.2d 1246, 568 Pa. 97, 2002 Pa. LEXIS 529 (Pa. 2002).

Pincite

792 A.2d 1246 (In re Joseph) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.