In re Joseph
815 A.2d 555, 572 Pa. 270, 2002 Pa. LEXIS 3177
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided December 9, 2002·No. No. 961 Disciplinary Docket No. 2·Published
Opinion
ORDER
AND NOW, this 9th day of December, 2002, upon consideration of the Report and Recommendations of the Disciplinary Board dated September 11, 2002, and the Petition for Review, the Petition for Reinstatement is denied. Pursuant to Rule 218(e), Pa.R.D.E., petitioner is directed to pay the expenses incurred by the Board in the investigation and processing of the Petition for Reinstatement.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
In re Joseph, 815 A.2d 555, 572 Pa. 270, 2002 Pa. LEXIS 3177 (Pa. 2002).
815 A.2d 555 (In re Joseph) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.