In re Jones

Fourth Circuit

In re Jones

293 F. App'x 228

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided September 15, 2008·No. No. 08-1610·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Samuel Tijuan Jones petitions for a writ of mandamus, alleging the district court has unduly delayed acting on his motion seeking reduction of his sentence pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c) (2000). He seeks [229]*229an order from this court directing the district court to act. We find there has been no undue delay in the district court. Accordingly, although we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis, we deny the mandamus petition. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DENIED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

Samuel Tijuan Jones petitions for a writ of mandamus, alleging the district court has unduly delayed acting on his motion seeking reduction of his sentence pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c) (2000). He seeks [229]*229an order from this court directing the district court to act. We find there has been no undue delay in the district court. Accordingly, although we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis, we deny the mandamus petition. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DENIED.

In re Jones, 293 F. App'x 228 (4th Cir. 2008).

Pincite

293 F. App'x 228 (In re Jones) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related