In re Jones

Fourth Circuit

In re Jones

382 F. App'x 321

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided June 10, 2010·No. No. 10-1170·Published

Opinion

Petition denied by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Samuel Tijuan Jones petitions for a writ of mandamus, seeking an order directing the magistrate judge to rule on Jones’ 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2006) motion. The magistrate judge issued his report and recommendation prior to Jones’ petition for writ of mandamus, and the district court has subsequently denied Jones’ § 2241 petition. Accordingly, although we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis, we deny Jones’ mandamus petition as moot. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DENIED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Petition denied by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Samuel Tijuan Jones petitions for a writ of mandamus, seeking an order directing the magistrate judge to rule on Jones’ 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2006) motion. The magistrate judge issued his report and recommendation prior to Jones’ petition for writ of mandamus, and the district court has subsequently denied Jones’ § 2241 petition. Accordingly, although we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis, we deny Jones’ mandamus petition as moot. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DENIED.

In re Jones, 382 F. App'x 321 (4th Cir. 2010).

Pincite

382 F. App'x 321 (In re Jones) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related