In re Jones

311 F. App'x 675
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided February 23, 2009·No. No. 08-2333·Published

Opinion

Petition denied by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Samuel Tijuan Jones petitions for a writ of mandamus, alleging the district court has unduly delayed acting on his Motion to Dismiss Count Five of the Indictment. He seeks an order from this court directing the district court to act. We find there has been no undue delay in the district court. Accordingly, although we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis, we deny the mandamus petition. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DENIED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re Jones, 311 F. App'x 675 (4th Cir. 2009).

311 F. App'x 675 (In re Jones) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.