In Re Greene County Hospital

59 B.R. 388, 1986 Bankr. LEXIS 6364
CourtDistrict Court, S.D. Mississippi
DecidedMarch 31, 1986
DocketBankruptcy 8408120 HC
StatusPublished
Cited by9 cases

This text of 59 B.R. 388 (In Re Greene County Hospital) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, S.D. Mississippi primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In Re Greene County Hospital, 59 B.R. 388, 1986 Bankr. LEXIS 6364 (S.D. Miss. 1986).

Opinion

MEMORANDUM OPINION

DAN M. RUSSELL, Jr., District Judge.

This case presents an appeal from the United States Bankruptcy Court. The appellant, Path-Science Laboratories, Inc., appeals the bankruptcy court’s order upholding the exercise of that court’s jurisdiction over a proceeding filed on behalf of Greene County Hospital. This Court has jurisdiction to hear this appeal pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 158.

The Court is mindful of the limitations placed upon this Court’s review of the lower court’s legal and factual determinations. The standard of appellate review in bankruptcy cases was set forth in Matter of Multiponics, Inc., 622 F.2d 709 (5th Cir.1980). “A Court’s conclusions of law are freely reviewable on appeal. United States v. Mississippi Valley Generating Co., 364 U.S. 520, 526, 81 S.Ct. 294, 297, 5 L.Ed.2d 268, 275 (1961); North Texas Production Credit v. Lee (In re Lee), 570 F.2d 1301, 1302 (5th Cir.1978). As to all findings of fact, however, a reviewing court of a bankruptcy decision must accept the findings as found unless they are clearly erroneous. F.R.Civ.P. 52, 53(e); Costello v. Fazio, 256 F.2d 903, 908 (9th Cir.1958).” Multiponics, Inc., 622 F.2d at 713.

The burden is squarely on the appellant to show an appellate court that finding is clearly erroneous, Griffin v. Missouri Pac. Ry. Co., 413 F.2d 9 (5th Cir.1969), and reversal of a finding is proper only when 'although there is evidence to support it, the reviewing court on the entire evidence is left with a definite and firm conviction that a mistake has been committed.’

Multiponics, Inc., 622 F.2d at 723 (citations omitted). See also, Bankr.Rule 8013, 11 U.S.C.A. With these guidelines in mind the Court will begin its review of the bankruptcy court’s decision.

The issue central to this appeal and to the lower court’s jurisdiction is whether Greene County Hospital is an entity which may be a debtor under Chapter 9 of the Bankruptcy Code. An entity may be a debtor under Chapter 9 of the Bankruptcy *389 Code only by meeting the elements of 11 U.S.C. § 109(c). Section 109(c) states in pertinent part as follows:

(c) An entity may be a debtor under Chapter 9 of this title if and only if such entity—
(1) is a municipality;
(2) is generally authorized to be a debtor under such chapter by State law, ...;
(3) is insolvent or unable to meet such entity’s debts as such debts mature;
(4) desires to effect a plan to adjust such debts; and
(5)(C) is unable to negotiate with creditors because such negotiation is impracticable; ....

Id. Therefore, the following questions must be answered in the affirmative in order for Greene County Hospital to be a debtor under Chapter 9 of the Bankruptcy Code.

I.Is Greene County Hospital an entity?
II.Is Greene County Hospital a municipality?
III. Is Greene County Hospital generally authorized to be a debtor by Mississippi law?
IV. Is Greene County Hospital insolvent or unable to meet its debts as they mature?
V.Does Greene County Hospital desire to effect a plan to adjust their debts?
VI.Was Greene County Hospital unable to negotiate with creditors because such negotiation was impracticable?

The first three questions involve reviewable legal conclusions while the final three tread upon impermissible review of factual determinations.

Greene County Hospital is an entity within the meaning of the Bankruptcy Code. Section 101(14) of Title 11 of the United States Code defines an entity to include “person, estate, trust and governmental unit.” 11 U.S.C. § 101(14) (Supp.1985). The hospital clearly is not a person, estate, or trust. The question becomes whether the hospital is a governmental unit. Section 101(14) provides that “ ‘governmental unit’ means ... municipality; ...” 11 U.S.C. § 101(24) (Supp.1985). Thus, by answering the second question, whether Greene County Hospital is a municipality, the first question of whether the hospital is an entity is simultaneously resolved.

The Bankruptcy Code defines municipality as “political subdivision or public agency or instrumentality of a State.” 11 U.S.C. § 101(32) (Supp.1985). The lower court held that the hospital was a public agency and thus qualified as a municipality for purposes of the Code. The Bankruptcy Code does not provide a definition for public agency. In Ex parte York County Natural Gas Authority, 238 F.Supp. 964, modified 362 F.2d 78 (4th Cir.1965), cert. denied, 368 U.S. 970, 86 S.Ct. 1277, 16 L.Ed.2d 310 (1966), in an action pursued under the provisions of Title 11, Chapter 9, United States Code, the court provided a legal test for determination of public agency status. “The legal test between a private or public authority or agency is whether the authority or agency is subject to control by public authority, state or municipal.” Ex parte York County, 238 F.Supp. at 976. Several sections of the Community Hospitals chapter of the Mississippi Code confirm that the board of supervisors of the county does have the power to exert some control over the county hospitals. Miss. Code Ann. 41-13-10 et seq. (Supp.1985). 1 See also, Coleman v. Humphreys *390 County Memorial Hospitals, 55 F.R.D. 507, 510 (N.D.Miss.1972). For instance, in Miss.Code Ann. § 41-13-10(d) (Supp.1985), the term “owner” as used in Sections 41-13-10 through 41-13-47 means

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

In Re Las Vegas Monorail Co.
429 B.R. 770 (D. Nevada, 2010)
Matter of Kent
190 B.R. 196 (D. New Jersey, 1995)
In Re County of Orange
183 B.R. 594 (C.D. California, 1995)
In Re Westport Transit District
165 B.R. 93 (D. Connecticut, 1994)
In Re Ellicott School Building Authority
150 B.R. 261 (D. Colorado, 1992)
In Re City of Bridgeport
128 B.R. 688 (D. Connecticut, 1991)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
59 B.R. 388, 1986 Bankr. LEXIS 6364, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-greene-county-hospital-mssd-1986.