In re Attorneys in Violation of Judiciary Law § 468-a
This text of 40 A.D.3d 1364 (In re Attorneys in Violation of Judiciary Law § 468-a) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Per Curiam. Respondent, who was admitted to practice by this Court in 1993, was suspended by this Court’s order dated January 6, 2005 for failure to comply with the attorney registration requirements of Judiciary Law § 468-a (14 AD3d 788 [2005]).
Respondent now requests reinstatement on the ground that he has complied with the attorney registration requirements of Judiciary Law § 468-a and the Rules of the Chief Administrator of the Courts (see 22 NYCRR part 118). Petitioner does not object to respondent’s application.
Respondent’s application is granted and he is ordered reinstated, effective immediately.
Cardona, P.J., Mercure, Crew III, Peters and Spain, JJ., concur. Ordered that respondent’s application is granted; and it is further ordered that respondent is reinstated as an attorney and counselor-at-law in the State of New York, effective immediately.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
40 A.D.3d 1364, 834 N.Y.S.2d 674, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-attorneys-in-violation-of-judiciary-law-468-a-nyappdiv-2007.