In re Attorneys in Violation of Judiciary Law § 468-a
13 A.D.3d 80, 789 N.Y.S.2d 421, 2004 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 14964
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in In re Attorneys in Violation of Judiciary Law § 468-a. Read the opinion of the Court — 291 A.D.2d 631 →
Opinion
Respondent reinstated as an attorney and counselor-at-law in the State of New York, effective the date hereof. No opinion. Concur—Nardelli, J.P., Mazzarelli, Saxe, Ellerin and Williams, JJ. [See 247 AD2d 158 (1998).]
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
In re Attorneys in Violation of Judiciary Law § 468-a, 13 A.D.3d 80, 789 N.Y.S.2d 421, 2004 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 14964 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2004).
13 A.D.3d 80 (In re Attorneys in Violation of Judiciary Law § 468-a) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
In re Attorneys in Violation of Judiciary Law § 468-a
247 A.D.2d 158 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1998)