In re Attorneys in Violation of Judiciary Law § 468-a
13 A.D.3d 170, 790 N.Y.S.2d 385, 2004 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 15421
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in In re Attorneys in Violation of Judiciary Law § 468-a. Read the opinion of the Court — 291 A.D.2d 631 →
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided December 14, 2004·Published
Opinion
Reinstatement denied, as indicated. No opinion.
Concur—Nardelli, J.P., Mazzarelli, Saxe, Ellerin and Williams, JJ. [See 247 AD2d 158 (1998).]
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
In re Attorneys in Violation of Judiciary Law § 468-a, 13 A.D.3d 170, 790 N.Y.S.2d 385, 2004 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 15421 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2004).
13 A.D.3d 170 (In re Attorneys in Violation of Judiciary Law § 468-a) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
In re Attorneys in Violation of Judiciary Law § 468-a
247 A.D.2d 158 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1998)