In re Attorneys in Violation of Judiciary Law § 468-a

12 A.D.3d 218, 786 N.Y.S.2d 913, 2004 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13416
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in In re Attorneys in Violation of Judiciary Law § 468-a. Read the opinion of the Court — 291 A.D.2d 631

Opinion

Respondent reinstated as an attorney and counselor-at-law in the State of New York effective the date hereof. No opinion. Concur—Nardelli, J.E, Mazzarelli, Saxe, Ellerin and Williams, JJ. [See 257 AD2d 127 (1999).]

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re Attorneys in Violation of Judiciary Law § 468-a, 12 A.D.3d 218, 786 N.Y.S.2d 913, 2004 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13416 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2004).

12 A.D.3d 218 (In re Attorneys in Violation of Judiciary Law § 468-a) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

In re Attorneys in Violation of Judiciary Law § 468-a
257 A.D.2d 127 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1999)