In re Attorneys in Violation of Judiciary Law § 468-a
286 A.D.2d 658, 731 N.Y.S.2d 610, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9510
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in In re Attorneys in Violation of Judiciary Law § 468-a. Read the opinion of the Court — 255 A.D.2d 827 →
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided September 27, 2001·Published
Opinion
—Respondent reinstated as an attorney and counselor-at-law in the State of New York, effective the date hereof. No opinion. Concur— Nardelli, J. P., Williams, Mazzarelli, Ellerin and Saxe, JJ. [See 257 AD2d 127.]
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
In re Attorneys in Violation of Judiciary Law § 468-a, 286 A.D.2d 658, 731 N.Y.S.2d 610, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9510 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2001).
286 A.D.2d 658 (In re Attorneys in Violation of Judiciary Law § 468-a) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
In re Attorneys in Violation of Judiciary Law § 468-a
257 A.D.2d 127 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1999)