In re Attorneys in Violation of Judiciary Law § 468-a
255 A.D.2d 207, 682 N.Y.S.2d 837, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12951
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in In re Attorneys in Violation of Judiciary Law § 468-a. Read the opinion of the Court — 230 A.D.2d 366 →
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided November 17, 1998·Published
Opinion
—Motion granted and respondent reinstated as an attorney and counselor-at-law in the State of New York, effectively the date hereof. No opinion. Concur — Milonas, J. P., Ellerin, Nardelli, Williams and Mazzarelli, JJ. [See, 240 AD2d 106.]
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
In re Attorneys in Violation of Judiciary Law § 468-a, 255 A.D.2d 207, 682 N.Y.S.2d 837, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12951 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1998).
255 A.D.2d 207 (In re Attorneys in Violation of Judiciary Law § 468-a) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
In re of Attorneys in Violation of Judiciary Law § 468-a
240 A.D.2d 106 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1998)