In re Attorneys in Violation of Judiciary Law § 468-a
286 A.D.2d 586, 730 N.Y.S.2d 853, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8517
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in In re Attorneys in Violation of Judiciary Law § 468-a. Read the opinion of the Court — 247 A.D.2d 158 →
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided September 6, 2001·Published
Opinion
—Respondent reinstated as an attorney and counselor-at-law in the State of New York, effective the date hereof. No opinion. Concur — Nardelli, J. P., Williams, Mazzarelli, Ellerin and Saxe, JJ. [See 230 AD2d 366.]
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
In re Attorneys in Violation of Judiciary Law § 468-a, 286 A.D.2d 586, 730 N.Y.S.2d 853, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8517 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2001).
286 A.D.2d 586 (In re Attorneys in Violation of Judiciary Law § 468-a) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
In re Attorneys in Violation of Judiciary Law § 468-a
230 A.D.2d 366 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1997)