In re Attorneys in Violation of Judiciary Law § 468-a
270 A.D.2d 50, 708 N.Y.S.2d 279, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2769
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in In re Attorneys in Violation of Judiciary Law § 468-a. Read the opinion of the Court — 230 A.D.2d 366 →
Opinion
—Motions granted and respondents reinstated as attorneys and counselors-at-law in the State of New York, effective the date hereof. No opinion. Concur — Nardelli, J. P., Williams, Mazzarelli, Ellerin and Saxe, JJ. {See, 240 AD2d 106, 247 AD2d 158.]
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
In re Attorneys in Violation of Judiciary Law § 468-a, 270 A.D.2d 50, 708 N.Y.S.2d 279, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2769 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2000).
270 A.D.2d 50 (In re Attorneys in Violation of Judiciary Law § 468-a) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
In re of Attorneys in Violation of Judiciary Law § 468-a
240 A.D.2d 106 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1998)
In re Attorneys in Violation of Judiciary Law § 468-a
247 A.D.2d 158 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1998)