In re Attorneys in Violation of Judiciary Law § 468-a
269 A.D.2d 340, 708 N.Y.S.2d 279, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2400
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in In re Attorneys in Violation of Judiciary Law § 468-a. Read the opinion of the Court — 230 A.D.2d 366 →
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided February 29, 2000·Published
Opinion
—Motions granted and respondents reinstated as attorneys and counselors-at-law in the State of New York, effective the date hereof. No opinion. Concur— Nardelli, J. P., Williams, Mazzarelli, Ellerin and Saxe, JJ. [See, 240 AD2d 106, 257 AD2d 127.]
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
In re Attorneys in Violation of Judiciary Law § 468-a, 269 A.D.2d 340, 708 N.Y.S.2d 279, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2400 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2000).
269 A.D.2d 340 (In re Attorneys in Violation of Judiciary Law § 468-a) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
In re of Attorneys in Violation of Judiciary Law § 468-a
240 A.D.2d 106 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1998)
In re Attorneys in Violation of Judiciary Law § 468-a
257 A.D.2d 127 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1999)