In re Attorneys in Violation of Judiciary Law § 468-a
269 A.D.2d 211, 711 N.Y.S.2d 887, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1445
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in In re Attorneys in Violation of Judiciary Law § 468-a. Read the opinion of the Court — 230 A.D.2d 366 →
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided February 10, 2000·Published
Opinion
—Motion granted and respondent reinstated as an attorney and counselor-at-law in the State of New York, effective the date hereof. No opinion. Concur — Nardelli, J. P., Williams, Mazzarelli, Ellerin and Saxe, JJ. [See, 240 AD2d 106.]
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
In re Attorneys in Violation of Judiciary Law § 468-a, 269 A.D.2d 211, 711 N.Y.S.2d 887, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1445 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2000).
269 A.D.2d 211 (In re Attorneys in Violation of Judiciary Law § 468-a) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
In re of Attorneys in Violation of Judiciary Law § 468-a
240 A.D.2d 106 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1998)