In re Attorneys in Violation of Judiciary Law § 468-a

249 A.D.2d 21, 671 N.Y.S.2d 971, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4371
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in In re Attorneys in Violation of Judiciary Law § 468-a. Read the opinion of the Court — 230 A.D.2d 366

Opinion

—The above-named respondents are reinstated as attorneys and counselors-at-law in the State of New York, effective April 2, 1998. No opinion. Concur — Milonas, J. P., Ellerin, Nardelli, Williams and Mazzarelli, JJ. [See, 230 AD2d 366.]

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re Attorneys in Violation of Judiciary Law § 468-a, 249 A.D.2d 21, 671 N.Y.S.2d 971, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4371 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1998).

249 A.D.2d 21 (In re Attorneys in Violation of Judiciary Law § 468-a) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

In re Attorneys in Violation of Judiciary Law § 468-a
230 A.D.2d 366 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1997)