Hussein v. State

973 N.E.2d 752, 19 N.Y.3d 899
New York Court of Appeals·Decided June 26, 2012·Published·Cited by 9 cases

Opinions

OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed with costs and the certified question should be answered in the negative.

Plaintiffs’ claims are neither moot nor unripe for review. The merits of the controversy are not before us.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Hussein v. State, 973 N.E.2d 752, 19 N.Y.3d 899 (N.Y. 2012).

973 N.E.2d 752 (Hussein v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Airey v. State of New York
2025 NY Slip Op 25054 (New York Supreme Court, Albany County, 2025)
Grand S. Point, LLC v. Bassett
2024 NY Slip Op 03364 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2024)
Maisto v. State of New York
2021 NY Slip Op 03350 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2021)
White v. Cuomo
2020 NY Slip Op 895 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2020)
Schulz v. Cuomo
133 A.D.3d 945 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2015)
Moore v. County of Essex
49 Misc. 3d 979 (New York Supreme Court, 2015)
Matter of Acevedo v. New York State Department of Motor Vehicles
132 A.D.3d 112 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2015)