Hughes v. Borden's Farm Products Company, Inc.
170 N.E. 132, 252 N.Y. 532, 1929 N.Y. LEXIS 599
Opinion
Judgment of the Appellate Division reversed and that of the Trial Term affirmed, with costs in this court and the Appellate Division, on the ground that there was evidence of negligence sufficient to present a question of fact for the jury; no opinion.
Concur: Cardozo, Ch. J., Pound, Crane, Lehman, O’Brien and Hubbs, JJ. Dissenting: Kellogg, J.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Hughes v. Borden's Farm Products Company, Inc., 170 N.E. 132, 252 N.Y. 532, 1929 N.Y. LEXIS 599 (N.Y. 1929).
170 N.E. 132 (Hughes v. Borden's Farm Products Company, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Stewart v. R. H. Macy & Co.
55 Misc. 2d 156 (Civil Court of the City of New York, 1967)
Spett v. President Monroe Building & Manufacturing Corp.
225 N.E.2d 527 (New York Court of Appeals, 1967)
Ashton v. J. J. Haggerty, Inc.
1 A.D.2d 964 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1956)
Romano v. City of New York
254 A.D. 906 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1938)
Tagg v. Senner
252 A.D. 784 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1937)
Hall v. New York Telephone Co.
242 A.D. 880 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1934)
Wheeler v. Deutch
242 A.D. 641 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1934)
Berta v. Mak Fruit & Vegetable Market, Inc.
237 A.D. 900 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1933)
Keegan v. Hohorst
235 A.D. 871 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1932)