Tagg v. Senner
This text of 252 A.D. 784 (Tagg v. Senner) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The action is to recover damages for personal injuries suffered by plaintiff when she slipped and fell on some spinach or other vegetable matter on the sidewalk in front of the premises occupied by defendant Senner. Defendant Tantillo was the tenant of an adjoining store in the same premises owned by Senner. The evidence justified the inference that the spinach fell from a stand maintained by Tantillo in front of the store. (Hughes v. Borden's Farm Products Co., Inc., 252 N. Y. 532; Keegan v. Hohorst, 235 App. Div. 871; affd., 261 N. Y. 566; Wheeler v. Deutch, 242 App. Div. 641; Jensen v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co., 240 id. 1008.) At the time of the accident the stand was maintained without a permit. It was a nuisance and Senner not only was chargeable with notice of the nuisance but had actual knowledge of its existence. [785]*785(Swords v. Edgar, 59 N. Y. 28; Timlin v. Standard Oil Co., 126 id. 514; Saphir v. Childs Company, Inc., 243 App. Div. 636.) Judgment for plaintiff against both defendants unanimously affirmed, with costs. Present —■ Carswell, Davis, Johnston, Adel and Close, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
252 A.D. 784, 299 N.Y.S. 150, 1937 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6290, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/tagg-v-senner-nyappdiv-1937.