Berta v. Mak Fruit & Vegetable Market, Inc.
237 A.D. 900
Opinion
Judgment of the City Court of Yonkers unanimously affirmed, with costs. [901]*901(Hughes v. Borden’s Farm Products Company, Inc., 252 N. Y. 532; Keegan v. Hohorst, 235 App. Div. 871.) Present — Young, Kapper, Hagarty, Tompkins and Davis, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Berta v. Mak Fruit & Vegetable Market, Inc., 237 A.D. 900 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1933).
237 A.D. 900 (Berta v. Mak Fruit & Vegetable Market, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Hughes v. Borden's Farm Products Company, Inc.
170 N.E. 132 (New York Court of Appeals, 1929)
Keegan v. Hohorst
235 A.D. 871 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1932)