Berta v. Mak Fruit & Vegetable Market, Inc.

237 A.D. 900

This text of 237 A.D. 900 (Berta v. Mak Fruit & Vegetable Market, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Berta v. Mak Fruit & Vegetable Market, Inc., 237 A.D. 900 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1933).

Opinion

Judgment of the City Court of Yonkers unanimously affirmed, with costs. [901]*901(Hughes v. Borden’s Farm Products Company, Inc., 252 N. Y. 532; Keegan v. Hohorst, 235 App. Div. 871.) Present — Young, Kapper, Hagarty, Tompkins and Davis, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Hughes v. Borden's Farm Products Company, Inc.
170 N.E. 132 (New York Court of Appeals, 1929)
Keegan v. Hohorst
235 A.D. 871 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1932)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
237 A.D. 900, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/berta-v-mak-fruit-vegetable-market-inc-nyappdiv-1933.