Hall v. New York Telephone Co.
242 A.D. 880
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedNovember 15, 1934
StatusPublished
This text of 242 A.D. 880 (Hall v. New York Telephone Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Hall v. New York Telephone Co., 242 A.D. 880 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1934).
Opinion
— Judgment affirmed, with costs.. Rhodes, McNamee and Bliss, JJ., concur; Hill, P. J., and Heffeman, J., dissent. (Tremblay v. Harmony Mills, 171 N. Y. 598; Crounse v. Sager, 224 App. Div. 10; Hughes v. Borden’s Farm Products Co., Inc., 252 N. Y. 532; Keegan v. Hohorst, 261 id. 566.)
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Tremblay v. . Harmony Mills
64 N.E. 501 (New York Court of Appeals, 1902)
Hughes v. Borden's Farm Products Company, Inc.
170 N.E. 132 (New York Court of Appeals, 1929)
Crounse v. Sager
224 A.D. 10 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1928)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
242 A.D. 880, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hall-v-new-york-telephone-co-nyappdiv-1934.