Howard v. State

638 So. 2d 213, 1994 WL 284618
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided June 29, 1994·No. 93-1958·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

638 So.2d 213 (1994)

Constance HOWARD, Appellant,
v.
STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 93-1958.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

June 29, 1994.

*214 Richard L. Jorandby, Public Defender, and Eric M. Cumfer, Asst. Public Defender, West Palm Beach, for appellant.

Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Joan L. Greenberg, Asst. Atty. Gen., West Palm Beach, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

The state concedes, and we find, that it was error for the trial court to refuse to conduct an inquiry to determine whether, when the state used peremptory challenges to exclude women from the jury, it was acting in an impermissibly discriminatory manner. J.E.B. v. Alabama ex rel. T.B., ___ U.S. ___, 114 S.Ct. 1419, 128 L.Ed.2d 89 (1994); Laidler v. State, 627 So.2d 1263 (Fla. 4th DCA 1993); State v. Neil, 457 So.2d 481 (Fla. 1984); State v. Johans, 613 So.2d 1319 (Fla. 1993).

REVERSED AND REMANDED.

WARNER and PARIENTE, JJ., and SMITH, FREDRICKA G., Associate Judge, concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Howard v. State, 638 So. 2d 213, 1994 WL 284618 (Fla. Ct. App. 1994).

638 So. 2d 213 (Howard v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Howard v. State
698 So. 2d 923 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1997)
Payne v. Gundy
468 S.E.2d 335 (West Virginia Supreme Court, 1996)