Howard v. State
This text of 638 So. 2d 213 (Howard v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Constance HOWARD, Appellant,
v.
STATE of Florida, Appellee.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
*214 Richard L. Jorandby, Public Defender, and Eric M. Cumfer, Asst. Public Defender, West Palm Beach, for appellant.
Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Joan L. Greenberg, Asst. Atty. Gen., West Palm Beach, for appellee.
PER CURIAM.
The state concedes, and we find, that it was error for the trial court to refuse to conduct an inquiry to determine whether, when the state used peremptory challenges to exclude women from the jury, it was acting in an impermissibly discriminatory manner. J.E.B. v. Alabama ex rel. T.B., ___ U.S. ___, 114 S.Ct. 1419, 128 L.Ed.2d 89 (1994); Laidler v. State, 627 So.2d 1263 (Fla. 4th DCA 1993); State v. Neil, 457 So.2d 481 (Fla. 1984); State v. Johans, 613 So.2d 1319 (Fla. 1993).
REVERSED AND REMANDED.
WARNER and PARIENTE, JJ., and SMITH, FREDRICKA G., Associate Judge, concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
638 So. 2d 213, 1994 WL 284618, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/howard-v-state-fladistctapp-1994.