Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Howard v. State

Howard v. State

627 So. 2d 605, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 12502, 1993 WL 504593
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Howard v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 616 So. 2d 484 →
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided December 8, 1993·No. No. 93-02162·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The denial of the defendant’s motion for belated appeal is affirmed without prejudice to a timely, successive motion for belated appeal containing the necessary allegations under oath. See Gilliam v. State, 611 So.2d 90 (Fla. 2d DCA 1992).

SCHOONOVER, AC.J., and PATTERSON and ALTENBERND, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Howard v. State, 627 So. 2d 605, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 12502, 1993 WL 504593 (Fla. Ct. App. 1993).

627 So. 2d 605 (Howard v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Gilliam v. State
611 So. 2d 90 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1992)