Howard v. State

580 So. 2d 348, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 5921, 1991 WL 98030
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Howard v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 545 So. 2d 352
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided June 12, 1991·No. No. 90-2967·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We grant the appellant belated appeal on the ground that the trial court’s order denying his rule 3.850 motion did not apprise him of the thirty-day period in which appeal must be filed. The order is affirmed as to [349]*349appellant’s grounds three and four alleged in his motion for post-conviction relief, and reversed and remanded to the trial court for an evidentiary hearing on grounds one and two, or for attachment to the order of denial of portions of the record that conclusively show that appellant is entitled to no relief.

AFFIRMED IN PART, REVERSED IN PART AND REMANDED.

LETTS, DELL and POLEN, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Howard v. State, 580 So. 2d 348, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 5921, 1991 WL 98030 (Fla. Ct. App. 1991).

580 So. 2d 348 (Howard v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.