Howard v. State

561 So. 2d 462, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 3643, 1990 WL 67324
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Howard v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 12 Fla. L. Weekly 2565
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided May 22, 1990·No. No. 89-1035·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Appellant, Calvin Louis Howard, appeals his convictions for burglary of a structure and resisting an officer with violence. We affirm.

Absent proof of actual reliance by the jury, the standard of fairness applies and the burden remains on appellant to prove the alleged error resulted in an unfair trial. See Harrell v. State, 405 So.2d 480 (Fla. 3d DCA 1981).

The record in this case does not reveal a reasonable probability that any extrinsic material could have affected the verdict. See U.S. v. Vasquez, 597 F.2d 192 (9th Cir.1979). Accordingly, we affirm.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Howard v. State, 561 So. 2d 462, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 3643, 1990 WL 67324 (Fla. Ct. App. 1990).

561 So. 2d 462 (Howard v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

United States v. Mary Josephine Vasquez
597 F.2d 192 (Ninth Circuit, 1979)
Harrell v. State
405 So. 2d 480 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1981)