Howard v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Howard v. State

561 So. 2d 462, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 3643, 1990 WL 67324

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedMay 22, 1990

DocketNo. 89-1035

StatusPublished

This text of 561 So. 2d 462 (Howard v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Howard v. State, 561 So. 2d 462, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 3643, 1990 WL 67324 (Fla. Ct. App. 1990).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Appellant, Calvin Louis Howard, appeals his convictions for burglary of a structure and resisting an officer with violence. We affirm.

Absent proof of actual reliance by the jury, the standard of fairness applies and the burden remains on appellant to prove the alleged error resulted in an unfair trial. See Harrell v. State, 405 So.2d 480 (Fla. 3d DCA 1981).

The record in this case does not reveal a reasonable probability that any extrinsic material could have affected the verdict. See U.S. v. Vasquez, 597 F.2d 192 (9th Cir.1979). Accordingly, we affirm.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI