Howard v. State
604 So. 2d 39, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 9569, 1992 WL 217180
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Howard v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 616 So. 2d 484 →
Opinion
After a jury trial, appellant was convicted of possession of a controlled substance, a third-degree felony, and was given a guidelines sentence. We affirm appellant’s judgment and sentence, but remand the case for correction of the written judgment which erroneously lists the degree of offense as a first-degree felony. See Hernandez v. State, 592 So.2d 764 (Fla. 1st DCA 1992).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Howard v. State, 604 So. 2d 39, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 9569, 1992 WL 217180 (Fla. Ct. App. 1992).
604 So. 2d 39 (Howard v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Hernandez v. State
592 So. 2d 764 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1992)