Howard v. State
604 So. 2d 39, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 9569, 1992 WL 217180
This text of 604 So. 2d 39 (Howard v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Howard v. State, 604 So. 2d 39, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 9569, 1992 WL 217180 (Fla. Ct. App. 1992).
Opinion
After a jury trial, appellant was convicted of possession of a controlled substance, a third-degree felony, and was given a guidelines sentence. We affirm appellant’s judgment and sentence, but remand the case for correction of the written judgment which erroneously lists the degree of offense as a first-degree felony. See Hernandez v. State, 592 So.2d 764 (Fla. 1st DCA 1992).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Hernandez v. State
592 So. 2d 764 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1992)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
604 So. 2d 39, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 9569, 1992 WL 217180, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/howard-v-state-fladistctapp-1992.