Howard v. State

473 So. 2d 716, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 864, 1985 Fla. App. LEXIS 13291
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided April 3, 1985·No. No. 84-1850·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

LETTS, Judge.

After reviewing the briefs and the record on appeal in this case, we find the appellant failed to demonstrate that his probation violation was not willful and substantive. Therefore, we affirm the revocation of his probation.

Nevertheless, the trial court failed to enter a written order revoking appellant’s probation, and accordingly, we remand for entry of same. Manley v. State, 453 So.2d 231 (Fla. 4th DCA 1984). The trial court, on remand, should enter an order to conform to its oral pronouncements which sentenced him to two years in prison for the strong armed robbery. However, it is without authority to sentence him for more than sixty days for the simple assault conviction, Section 784.011(2), Florida Statutes (1983), and its order should reflect this.

GLICKSTEIN and BARKETT, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Howard v. State, 473 So. 2d 716, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 864, 1985 Fla. App. LEXIS 13291 (Fla. Ct. App. 1985).

473 So. 2d 716 (Howard v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Howard v. State
484 So. 2d 1232 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1986)
Yolman v. State
473 So. 2d 716 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1985)